The written tradition…seems to be the common mode of apprehension within encounters of conversation; hmmm, an ethics that runs on a lackluster self-motivation, a.k.a. “reading a book” — or, rather, observing a text. By “text” I mean anything that expresses with some sort of language structure [i.e., movies, music, societal man, the event]. But how can this be examined historically? Can one definitively construct an evolutionary process that follows the step-by-step emergence of technology? [Yoo-hoo!, Can you say Futurism?] More on this later…but now let us confront the workings of the brain — specifically with the distinctions made in female vs. male capacity for particular “lobe”–functions, and let us not forget the emotional authority that prevails when it comes to decision-making, its conquering “rationality”, decapitating its own role, that is, the typical prominence in ordering human behavior. [structuring “the event”]. Can this occurrence be made static? Or…better yet, can this energy-fizzle be translated into other outputs wholly beneficial to the progression of human manifestations (productions)? What other modes/functions/exertions need to be researched/accounted-for to understand better, to get a clearer picture of how human life can be further edified w/this knowledge? Has this tainted the humanist purity traditionally attributed to logic? Godel!...good man, did a lot for a lot of minds, cuz: c’mon — this ain’t just for me, you, them, my mom, but…everybody!! Commonality: can’t be ignorant with it. [don’t be a retard, i.e., an aristocrat]

—One Spark to Another(s) (him at the buffet)